In a world driven by profit, the question of environmental stewardship has always been somewhat complex. This
quandary is best summarised by the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which
concluded that our global response to climate change is not restricted by scientific knowledge or technological
capabilities, but rather by politics and fossil fuel interests.
The greed paradox
As infamously stated by Gordon Gekko in The Wolf of Wall Street, "Greed is good." This sentiment has underpinned
the world's financial evolution, but at what cost?
Greed, in its relentless pursuit of profit, has led to a failure to account for the environmental toll of economic
growth. This failure translates into environmental crises affecting our soil, water, and air. The catastrophic impacts
include exacerbated climate change and a wide array of ecological challenges.
The climate focus and carbon tunnel syndrome
Our global attention seems to be narrowly fixated on the concept of climate change and one specific element,
CO2. But climate models are far more intricate, encompassing oceans, flora, fauna, the sun, and our atmospheric
makeup.
Unfortunately, the polarised debates surrounding climate change are reminiscent of UK's Brexit, filled with doom
on one side and denial on the other. With fossil fuel-backed naysayers controlling the narrative, even events like
COP28 have come under scrutiny for being influenced by oil companies.
Investment in regenerative technologies
The need for investment in nature-regenerative technologies is clear. However, data from the International
Energy Agency (IEA) reveals a disappointing trend. Despite record profits, the oil and gas industry has reduced
investments in exploration and production, diverting profits to shareholders instead of fostering sustainable
technologies.
The rise of electric vehicles and renewable energy is posing a threat to traditional fossil fuel consumption. Yet,
the industry seems hesitant to invest in the future, fearing the losses experienced in the past from ventures like
fracking.
Conscious capitalism: a new paradigm?
The concept of Conscious Capitalism, popularised by John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, and elaborated in the book
“The Conscious Capitalism Field Guide,” provides a potential path forward. With its four pillars of higher
purpose, stakeholder orientation, conscious leadership, and conscious culture, this philosophy calls for a
rethinking of business ethics.
The UN's 1987 definition of sustainability aligns well with the principles of Conscious Capitalism. It promotes a
vision where business is not solely about profit but recognises and serves all stakeholders, including the planet.
Conclusion: towards a new ethos
The current era demands a shift from mere rhetoric to decisive action. Environmental challenges cannot be swept
under the rug of profit. The understanding of our climate is not an excuse to inaction but rather a call to
embrace innovative solutions.
By adopting the principles of Conscious Capitalism, organisations can demonstrate a commitment to a higher purpose
that transcends profit. It’s time for leadership at all levels to embrace this vision, aligning the interests of
stakeholders, recognising the interdependent nature of business, and taking responsible actions for the betterment
of the planet.
In a world where greed has driven us to the brink, it is perhaps time to imagine a new mythical beast: a capitalistic
system that does not just consume but also conserves and nurtures. The seeds of this idea are present, but will we
allow them to grow? Only time will tell.